| Last week we tried to focus the problem for the discussion
of the following weeks. We want to study the relationship
between the Law of Moses and the Gospel of Christ. This is one
of the misunderstood subjects in religious matters today. Last
week, however we pointed out that this is not a problem peculiar
to modern times, but that many of the epistles in the New
Testament were written to correct misimpressions concerning the
Law of Moses. It is our prayer that our lessons may correct some
misunderstandings, and clarify some hazy points in the minds of
those who study with us. It is very apparent, from our lesson
title; what shall be the nature of our lesson. I believe that
the Scriptures clearly teach that men; in this dispensation, are
not living under the Law of Moses, but rather, we are living
under the Law of Christ. According to Scriptural usage of the
terms faith or belief, one cannot believe a proposition unless
there be evidence for belief. A conviction not supported by
evidence is but an opinion. Mine is a belief, for the Scripture
abounds in evidence showing that we are not under the Law of
Moses today. The Scriptures also command that one be ready to
give an answer concerning the reason of the hope and the faith
in him. This we shall try to do in this lesson.
Is the Old Testament Inspired?
There are many people who believe, and many who teach, that
all an individual has to do in order to go to Heaven is to keep
the Ten Commandment Law. Yet those individuals could not produce
Scriptures to prove such a belief to save their lives. The Law
of Moses was done away, as we shall study presently.
However, there is one point upon which clarification needs to
be made before we begin studying these various passages showing
that the Ten Commandment Law is not yet binding. There are some
people who think that if one teaches that the Law of Moses was
done away after it was in effect for a given period of time, and
that it served its purpose and was done away, that this one is
saying that the Old Testament was uninspired. There were some
people who felt exactly this way in New Testament times. When
Paul- wrote to the Galatian brethren, in Chapter 3, and told
them that salvation was by the promise culminating in Christ,
and not by the Law of Moses; they asked, "What then serveth the
law?"
Friends, I believe the Old Testament is inspired just as
strongly as any of these advocates of the theory that we are yet
living under the Ten Commandment Law. In fact, I am quite
confident that I hold a much stronger view of inspiration than
do most of modern denominationalists. Denominationalism has
become greatly affected by the studies of higher criticism,
which in nothing but Modernism. In fact, the Old Testament
Scriptures themselves teach that the Old Testament Law was
temporary. Further, the New Testament teaches us that the Old
Testament Law was done away. The individual who teaches that the
Ten Commandment Law is still binding must therefore disregard
the teaching of both the Old Testament and the New Testament.
Jesus said, "For if ye believed Moses, ye would believe me; for
he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye
believe my words?" (Jno. 5:46,47). Jesus said that the man who
does not believe the Old Testament will not believe the New. It
is showing a lack of faith in the Old Testament to argue
contrary to its teaching. It teaches that the Law of Moses was
to be done away. So those who argue that we are yet under the
Old Testament are the ones who do not believe the Old Testament.
They also must be unconscious of New Testament teaching, some of
which we shall have occasion to study later.
Are We Under Any Law?
One other clarification needs to be made before we proceed
further. Simply because one does not believe that the Old
Testament Law, the Ten Commandment Law, is still binding; does
not mean that one can violate the laws against killing, lying,
stealing, adultery, which are stated in the Law. Almost every
commandment in the Ten Commandment Law, is restated, in
substance, in the New Testament. Jesus not only forbade killing,
but he made a stricter law. He said, "Ye have heard that it was
said of them of old time, thou shalt not kill: and whosoever
shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: but I say unto
you, that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be in
danger of the judgment" (Matt. 5:21,22). This is the law that I
believe. to be binding upon us today. It is even stricter than
the Old Covenant.
Let us notice one other instance in which the basic content
of the Ten Commandment Law is restated in the New Testament.
Each time it is enlarged. Jesus said, "Ye have heard that it was
said, Thou shalt not commit adultery: but I say unto you, that
every one that looketh on a woman to lust after her hath
committed adultery with her already in his heart" (Matt. 5:27,
28). The Law said one had to commit the actual, overt act to be
guilty. But not so with the Law of Christ. One is not to kill,
or hate his brother today, not because it was a part of the Ten
Commandment Law, but because it is a part of the Law of Christ.
One is not to commit adultery or to look on a woman to lust
after her, not because Moses' Law forbade and condemned
adultery, but because Christ's Law prohibits it. Every
commandment of the Ten Commandments, save one, is restated in
substance in the New Testament. We are to follow the Law of
Christ, rather than the Law of Moses.
The Passing of the Old Covenant
Let us notice now, an instance in which the Old Testament
plainly declared that there would come a time when it would be
done away. This quotation that declares the Law is to be done
away is found in Jer. 31:31-34, and Paul quotes it in Hebrews
8:7-13: "For if that first covenant had been faultless, then
would no place have been sought for a second. For finding fault
with them, he saith, Behold the days come, saith the Lord, that
I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the
house of Judah; Not according to the covenant that I made with
their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to lead
them forth out of the land of Egypt. For they continued not in
my covenant, And I regarded them not, saith the Lord. I will put
my laws into their mind, And on their heart also will I write
them: And I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a
people; And they shall not teach every man his fellow-citizen,
And every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: For all shall
know me, From the least to the greatest of them. For I will be
merciful to their iniquities, And their sins will I remember no
more." To this quotation, Paul added, "In that he saith, A new
covenant, he hath made the first old. But that which is becoming
old and waxeth aged is nigh unto vanishing away."
Paul therefore used these statements from Jeremiah's prophecy
to show that the Old Covenant was done away. Therefore those who
maintain that the Old Testament Law is still binding upon men
today deny the teaching of the Old Testament itself. Paul said
the first Law was faulty; therefore a second was given.
There are many other passages in the New Testament that
declare that this Old Covenant was abrogated. In the book of
Ephesians, Paul said that the Law was a barrier, a wall, between
the Jews and the Gentiles. Remember that the Law of Moses was
given only to Jews, and that it excluded the Gentiles. Therefore
the Law separated these two classes of people. But Paul taught
that no longer did this barrier exist. Now both Jews and
Gentiles had a right to the promises of God. "Wherefore
remember, that once ye the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called
Uncircumcision by that which is called Circumcision, in the
flesh, made by hands; that ye were at that time separate from
Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers
from the covenants of the promise, having no hope and without
God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus ye that once were far
off are made nigh in the blood of Christ. For he is our peace
who made both one, and brake down the middle wall of partition,
having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of
commandments contained in ordinances (Eph. 2:11-17)." He spoke
of the Circumcision and the Uncircumcision, which of course,
means the Jews and the Gentiles. He said that there previously
was a barrier between the two, so that the Gentiles had no hope
and were without God in the world. But now this barrier has been
taken away. What is the barrier or what was the barrier between
Jew and Gentile? Friends, I do not have to guess as to what the
barrier that Paul said was taken out of the way is. According to
Paul, the barrier is the Law of Moses; It is the "law of
commandments." What happened to the "law of commandments?" It
was done away.
"For he is our peace, who made both one, and brake down the
middle wall of partition, having abolished in his flesh the
enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances;
that he might create in himself of the two one new man, so
making peace; and might reconcile them both in one body unto God
through the cross, having slain the enmity thereby; and he came
and preached peace to you that were far off, and peace to them
that were nigh, for through him we both have our access in one
Spirit unto the Father" (Eph. 2:14-18).
Paul so clearly taught in the Ephesian passage that the Old
Testament was done away in Christ, that one will need help from
some modern denominational teacher of error to misunderstand his
message. This Law was done away in order that all men might be
reconciled unto God in one body, the church. Paul emphasized
that these racial barriers were broken down in Jesus Christ,
when he said, "There can be neither Jew nor Greek, there can be
neither bond nor free, there can be no male and female, for ye
are all one man in Christ Jesus" (Gal. 3:28).
Jesus indicated that there was a change of law by His
teaching in the Sermon on the Mount, as we have already
observed. John, as he recorded events in the life of Christ,
commented, "For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth
came through Jesus Christ" (Jno. 1:17).
Conclusion
So one who does not believe that the Old Testament Law was
temporary, and is therefore abrogated, must reject the teaching
of both the Old and New Testaments. Yet we studied last week how
the danger of intermixing Judaism with Christianity is as much a
problem today as it was in New Testament times. It is our humble
prayer that by our studies we can help correct some of the
misimpressions of men, and clarify and exalt God's teaching
concerning the relationship existing between the Law of Moses
and the Gospel of Christ. |